Clear from Control→The method
Relationship trauma isn't one stage. It's five.
Trauma training tells therapists to start at stage 4. Most survivors of coercive control are at stage 2 or 3 when they walk in.
This model gives you the recognition and sequencing skill that closes the gap - and a structured language for clinical formulation in active-control contexts.
Last reviewed October 2026.
Five stages, two diagnostic gaps.
Stages of survivor recovery, not therapist activities. The diagnostic gap the pathway closes: most clients arrive at stages 2–3, while standard trauma training tells therapists to start at stage 4.
- IEscaping domestic abuseStill in the relationship. Growing awareness, no clear escape plan.
- Most clients arrive hereIIEscaping victimhoodPhysically left. High risk of return. Ongoing post-relational coercion.
- IIIResolving victimhoodWon't return - but negative contact continues through court, co-parenting, finances.
- Standard trauma training starts hereIVResolving survivorshipAbuser's influence reduced. Trauma-processing interventions become appropriate.
- The work the training teaches: walking your client from stages 2–3 up to here, where trauma processing can land.
- VResolved survivorshipThe relational wound is processed. Broader mental-health work, if needed.
Peer-reviewed and practitioner-facing.
Continuous relationship trauma - the clients our models can't see
The Psychologist (British Psychological Society) · July 2026 · Why "post-traumatic" is the wrong tense for many survivors of domestic abuse, and what applied psychologists can do about it.
Domestic abuse - a model for recovery
Healthcare Counselling and Psychotherapy Journal (BACP) · July 2025 · The CARE framework and recovery-stage model.
Why businesses shouldn't ignore domestic abuse in the lives of staff
People Management (CIPD) · 2024 · Practitioner-facing piece on workplace impact and employer response.
Staff abused at home - what employers need to know
People Management (CIPD) · 2024 · Recognising and responding to abuse presenting in the workplace.
The stabilisation framework.
Four moves a clinician can make when the client is still inside the dynamic - or thinks they've left it but the system hasn't.
A formulation framework, not just a trauma protocol.
NRT runs across all five stages as a way of mapping attachment dynamics, abuser narrative, and ongoing external influences. Trauma-processing interventions become appropriate at stage 4 - but the framework starts at stage 1.
Conventional trauma therapy assumes
- ×The threat has ended.
- ×The narrative is broken but recoverable.
- ×Stabilisation precedes processing in a straight line.
- ×Client and clinician share a clear "before / after."
NRT works when
- ✓The threat is ongoing - court, contact, workplace.
- ✓The narrative is still being actively rewritten by another party.
- ✓Stabilisation and processing must interleave, not stack.
- ✓"Post" is a misleading prefix.
Processing trauma that previously refused to move.
NRT is the trauma-processing protocol that sits across stages III–V of the arc. It treats the narrative itself as the regulation target - not as raw material to reprocess, but as the structure that holds regulation in place.
It draws on attachment theory, narrative therapy, and trauma-focused CBT, but the move is distinct: regulate the story to regulate the system. When the threat is ongoing, this is often the only protocol that lands.
- iLocate the narrative break - not "what happened," but where the story snapped.
- iiStabilise the unbroken portions - what the client still has access to.
- iiiReconstruct attachment. Self-to-self before self-to-other.
- ivRe-author with constraints. Honest about ongoing risk; not falsely resolved.
- vTheory-driven, practice-compatible language. Designed to map onto what you already do that works.
See the protocols in practice.
Start with the screening tool to see how the lens lands on a current case, then choose the entry point that matches your caseload.